在线观看日产精品,亚洲成人av一区二区,久久影院100000精品

內容簡介

刑法，是法學公法中最為重要的部門法之一，也是法學本科生必修課程。

在這本教材中，作者采用簡明易懂的語言將其重點知識，如刑事責任的要素，英美法中關于故意與過失的界定，各個重點罪名的詳述等內容一一作了介紹與闡釋。教材每一章節之始，作者為其內容的重點知識詞匯編制了知識網絡圖，這種最為直觀的方式，可以使學生在學習前就對其有一個完整及初步的了解。

同時，每一章節還配有相關的案例以及分析，這樣可以幫助學生理解相關知識并熟悉司法實踐過程，提高運用能力。再有，每一章節還附有部分內容的知識圖表，便于學生對所學的知識能夠得到及時的總結和梳理。

刑法學》這本教材語言簡明易懂，便于老師和學生在短時間內，掌握刑法學的主要內容，并了解英國法是從怎樣的角度和思路介紹刑法內容的。教材附錄部分的重點詞匯，可以使學生很快地理解重點詞匯的含義，以掃清閱讀和學習障礙。

編輯推薦

Pearson出版社授權華中科技大學出版社出版的"法學初階西方法學經典教材系列影印雙語注釋本"正式與大家見面了！！！本書采取影印版附加中英文雙語的全新注釋方式，便于讀者的學習與理解。為原汁原味的英國法內容配以圖表、案例、重點詞匯、復習筆記、參考資源等內容，全新的英美法教學模式，地道的法律英語表述方式，不僅展現出法學古老嚴謹的本質，更彰顯出法律獨特的魅力！五彩繽紛的樣式，讓法學書籍也可以這樣美麗！！！

作者簡介

法學初階西方法學經典教材系列影印雙語注釋本》是英國PEARSON出版社出版的一套法學經典教材，教材由英國著名法學教授負責編寫，本套教材一共有二十多本。該系列涵蓋了國內法學本科生必修的法學課程內容，是一套非常適合中國法學院校本科生系統了解與學習英美法系課程內容的經典教材，同時該教材兼顧法律英語的學習目的。

在線預覽

1 ELEMENTS of CRIMINAL LIAbILITy

Problems arise in fixing liability if there is a lapse in time after the actus reus before the mens rea comes into being and， equally， in situations where the mens rea precedes the actus reus。

Actus reus occurring before mens rea

This means that the defendant completes the prohibited act before he forms the prohibited state of mind。 The scenario in figure 1。1 is an example of this。

Two distinct approaches have been used to secure a conviction in situations where the actus reus is complete prior to the formation of mens rea：

treating the actus reus as a continuing act (Fagan) (see below)； and，

basing liability on failure to act after creating a dangerous situation (miller) (see pages 78)。 ExAm TIP Lack of coincidence is a popular examination topic。 you will need to be able to explain why lack of coincidence is a problem and how the courts have tackled this。 A good grasp of cases such as Fagan， miller and church is important as the facts demonstrate the problems with lack of coincidence and the judgments illustrate the creativity of the judiciary in overcoming this impediment to conviction。 KEy CAsE Fagan v。 Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1969) 1 qB 439 (dC) Concerning： coincidence of actus reus and mens rea Facts

The defendant accidentally stopped his car on a policeman`s foot but then refused to move when he realised this。 He appealed against his conviction for assaulting a police officer in the execution of his duty on the basis that at the time of the actus reus (when his car made contact with the policeman`s foot) he had no mens rea (because it was accidental) and by the time he formed mens rea (refusing to move) there was no act upon which to base liability (he merely refused to undo that which he had already done)。 Legal principle It was held that the actus reus of assault (in the sense of a battery) came into being when contact was first made between the car and the policeman`s foot。 This actus reus continued for the whole time that the car remained on the foot， only ending when the car was moved。 At the point in time that the defendant became aware of the contact and refused to move， he developed the requisite mens rea and liability was complete。

……